Towards a Fairer and More Humane Netherlands

The Netherlands finds itself in a time of sharp divisions. Public debate is increasingly coloured by polarisation: people stand against each other rather than alongside one another. Populist slogans, often aimed at reinforcing “us-versus-them” divides, dominate the political arena. Far-right movements are gaining traction, while hate speech on social media and in talk shows is becoming increasingly normalised.

This development strikes at the heart of our democratic rule of law. Human rights, once firmly anchored in law and practice, risk being reduced to formal documents without real protection. Political decision-making seems driven by short-term polling rather than long-term vision. Meanwhile, structural challenges are growing: a housing crisis, an ageing population, pressure on healthcare, climate change, and international instability.

The issues are broad, yet closely interlinked. Take migration: debate is often framed in terms of fear, while reality is more complex. Labour migration is by far the largest group of newcomers—mostly from EU countries—and is essential for sectors such as construction, logistics, and agriculture. At the same time, the right to asylum—enshrined in international treaties—remains a fundamental principle, requiring a faster and more transparent decision-making process to both safeguard those in need of protection and keep reception facilities manageable.


From problem to perspective

The problems are serious, but not insoluble. There are many ways out of this downward spiral. It starts with restoring dialogue and strengthening social cohesion. Local citizens’ assemblies, interfaith meetings, and participatory neighbourhood projects show that it is possible: groups from different backgrounds working together on solutions.

Policy must also be grounded in facts and research, not in emotion or short-term sentiment. Consider the housing market: decades of liberalisation and government withdrawal have led to sky-high rents and long waiting lists. A renewed investment agenda in social housing, combined with rent regulation, could make affordable housing attainable again—something that remains the norm in places like Vienna, Austria.

The same applies to the economy. Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics and Amartya Sen’s work show that prosperity is more than GDP growth. In the Dutch context, this means: making polluters pay, taxing large fortunes more fairly, and structurally investing in essential professions such as teachers and healthcare workers, who are currently often undervalued both financially and socially.


An integrated vision

A future-proof society requires an overarching vision in which humanity, empathy, honesty, freedom, equality, and solidarity are central. These are not abstract ideals, but practical guidelines for policymaking.

Freedom without equality leads to inequality; equality without freedom can become stifling; solidarity gives both meaning by embedding them in mutual responsibility. In this spirit, the democratic rule of law should not only be legally protected but also lived daily. That means: independent media prioritising facts over sensation, social media platforms being transparent about algorithms, and education that not only imparts knowledge but also teaches democratic skills.

The climate challenge illustrates the need for an integrated approach. As a delta country, the Netherlands is vulnerable to the effects of sea-level rise and extreme weather. Stewardship—managing the earth for future generations—demands the rapid phase-out of fossil fuels, investment in renewable energy, and social justice in the energy transition. This means ensuring lower-income households do not bear the heaviest burdens, even though they have contributed least to the problem.


From vision to action

Translating vision into practice requires concrete steps:

  • Political reforms, such as citizens’ assemblies and participatory budgeting, to involve citizens actively in decision-making.
  • Economic reforms to reduce inequality, for example through progressive taxation and wealth redistribution.
  • Investment in affordable housing and protection of caravan sites as part of cultural heritage.
  • Reform of the healthcare system to curb profit-maximisation and guarantee equal access.
  • Protection of the digital space against monopolies and data misuse, including moral frameworks for artificial intelligence.
  • Active defence of the democratic rule of law against erosion of institutions and growing distrust.

Security also requires a balanced approach to defence and diplomacy: more European cooperation and less dependence on the US, combined with strengthening international law and reforming decision-making in the UN Security Council.


Conclusion: a shared responsibility

The core message is clear: a just, humane, and sustainable society does not arise by itself. It demands conscious choices, determined leadership, and engaged citizens.

Politics must once again serve the public interest rather than short-term gain. Civil society must build bridges rather than walls. Citizens must be willing to engage in conversation—even with those who think differently.

If politics, society, and individuals take that responsibility together, the Netherlands can become an example of how a modern democracy, despite internal and external tensions, can preserve and even strengthen its values.





Reacties

Populaire posts van deze blog

Geen woorden voor dit verlies – maar ook geen ruimte voor haat

Een moreel kompas voor politiek, bestuur en samenleving

Hegel en de rechtvaardige samenleving: vrijheid, erkenning en de staat